A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Noninvasive cardiac output determinations]. | LitMetric

The thermodilution determination of cardiac output (CO) by pulmonary arterial catheterization is considered to be the gold standard. However, a diversity of complications associated with the insertion and use of a catheter has made for the design of CO-measuring devices in a mini- or noninvasive mode. This prospective controlled study has been conducted to compare various CO determination techniques by the shape of the arterial curve (ART), as shown by the use of a transesophageal Doppler ultrasonic sensor (TEDUS) determining the blood flow velocity in the descending thoracic aorta by the Fick's backward equation with partial CO2 recirculation, by measuring thoracic bioimpedance (Tbio) by bolus thermodilution as the reference method (CO BT). In all the study examined, the mean CO values are lower than those in the reference method. In addition, there was a wide scatter of the CO values calculated by alternative methods. The mean difference and its standard deviation are 1.27 +/- 2.26 (ART); 0.87 +/- 1.57 (TEDUS); 1.01 +/- 1.46 (Fick); and 1.46 +/- 1.70 (Tbio). The errors of the methods, as compared to CO BT have the following values: APT, 27% (24-31% conference interval (CI)); TEDUS, 19% (17-21% CI); Fick, 20% (19-22%); Tbio, 25% (22-27%). By taking into account the findings, it should be stated that there is not any accurate mini- or noninvasive CO determination method that could completely substitute for the classical thermodilution technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac output
8
mini- noninvasive
8
reference method
8
[noninvasive cardiac
4
output determinations]
4
determinations] thermodilution
4
thermodilution determination
4
determination cardiac
4
output pulmonary
4
pulmonary arterial
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!