A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Caries risk-based fluoride supplementation for children. | LitMetric

Caries risk-based fluoride supplementation for children.

Pediatr Dent

School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Published: January 2008

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate primary care physicians' recommendation of fluoride supplements based upon a child's caries risk.

Methods: A representative sample of family physicians (FPs) and pediatricians (PDs) in the United States was mailed a letter and a questionnaire that described case scenarios of 2-year-old children-one with low and the other with high caries-risk -as well as questions about opinions on fluoride supplement use. The physicians' opinions were compared with CDC experts' consensus on the same scenarios.

Results: The response rates were 43% for FPs and 52% for PDs. FPs and PDs had a high agreement level (76% ond 80%, respectively) with CDC experts regarding the need for fluoride supplementation of the high-risk child. For o low risk child, all physicians showed a significantly lower level of agreement with the CDC experts (15% for FPs; 7% for PDs).

Conclusions: The majority of primary care physicians follow the current fluoride supplementation guideline without considering the caries risk status of a child. If caries risk status is to be used to tailor preventive regimens, then physicians need to be educated on how to identify children with the highest need for prevention.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluoride supplementation
12
primary care
8
cdc experts
8
caries risk
8
risk status
8
fluoride
5
caries
4
caries risk-based
4
risk-based fluoride
4
supplementation children
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!