Background Context: Dynamic stabilization is an alternative to fusion intended to eliminate or at least minimize the potential for adjacent level degeneration. Different design approaches are used in pedicle screw-based systems that should have very different effects on the loading of the posterior column and intervertebral disc. If the implant system distributes these loads more evenly, loads in the pedicle screws will be reduced, and screw loosening will be prevented.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine how two different design approaches to dynamic stabilization systems, Dynesys System and the Total Posterior Spine (TOPS) System, affect the load carried by the pedicle screws.
Study Design/setting: A controlled laboratory study in which the magnitude of the moments on pedicle screws during flexion-extension and lateral bending were measured after implantation of two posterior dynamic stabilization devices into cadaveric spines.
Methods: Five lumbar spines were tested in flexion-extension and lateral bending. Specimens were tested sequentially: first intact, then with the Dynesys system implanted, and finally with the TOPS system implanted. Range of motion (ROM) for each construct was measured with a 210N and 630N compressive load. The pedicle screws were instrumented with strain gages, which were calibrated so that the moments on the screws could be determined from the strain measurements.
Results: Compared with intact values, ROM decreased in flexion-extension and lateral bending when the Dynesys System was implanted. With implantation of the TOPS System, ROM returned to values that were not significantly different from the intact values. The moments in the screws with the Dynesys System were significantly higher than with the TOPS System with increases of as much as 56% in flexion-extension and 86% in lateral bending.
Conclusions: The design of the posterior stabilization device influences the amount of load seen by the pedicle screws and therefore the load sharing between spinal implant and bone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.08.008 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Enhancing the Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Using 3D-Printed Screw-Guiding Techniques in the Lumbosacral Region for Small Breed Dogs: A Cadaveric Study.
Animals (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si 24341, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.
A 3D-printed guide is an effective method for accurately placing pedicle screws in dog vertebrae. While a conventional drill guide allows precise pilot hole formation, it can lead to potential screw wobbling during insertion. In this study, we applied a technique that assists with both drilling and screw insertion, and we compared the accuracy of screw placement using this approach with that achieved by the conventional drill guide.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomechanical insights into anterolateral vertebral screw fixation in osteoporotic spines: a comparative study of fixation methods and positions using porcine vertebrae.
J Orthop Surg Res
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Objective: Combining oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with posterior pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) has been proposed to reduce cage subsidence, especially in osteoporotic spines. Recently, anterolateral screw-rod fixation has gained interest as it allows direct pathology observation and avoids a posterior approach. However, controversies exist between anterolateral screw fixation systems and traditional PPSF due to variations in osteoporotic vertebral mineral density, screw fixation positions, and fixation methods (bicortical vs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAwake, endoscopic lumbar interbody spinal fusion: 10 years of experience with the first 400 cases.
J Neurosurg Spine
January 2025
2Anesthesiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Objective: Awake, endoscopic spinal fusion has been utilized as an ultra-minimally invasive surgery technique to accomplish the goals of spinal fixation, fusion, and disc height restoration. While many techniques exist for this approach, this series represents a single institution's experience with a large cohort and the evolution of this method.
Methods: The medical records of a consecutive series of 400 patients treated over a 10-year period were retrospectively reviewed.
The Risk of Intravenous Cement Leakage and Short-term Outcomes of Selective Cement-augmented Pedicle Screws: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Clin Spine Surg
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjyuku, Tokyo.
Study Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using cement-augmented pedicle screw (CAPS) fixation only for the cephalad and caudal vertebral bodies.
Summary Of Background Data: Pedicle screw fixation is less effective in patients with low-quality bone.
[O-arm Versus C-arm: Comparison of the Learning Curves and Accuracy in Transpedicular Screw Fixation of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis].
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech
January 2025
Neurochirurgická klinika Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc.
Purpose Of The Study: The annual number of spinal fusion procedures has been increasing and is well documented worldwide. The O-arm is slowly becoming the standard for transpedicular screw insertion. The accuracy and safety of this method have been confirmed by many studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!