We describe the construction of a digital brain atlas composed of data from manually delineated MRI data. A total of 56 structures were labeled in MRI of 40 healthy, normal volunteers. This labeling was performed according to a set of protocols developed for this project. Pairs of raters were assigned to each structure and trained on the protocol for that structure. Each rater pair was tested for concordance on 6 of the 40 brains; once they had achieved reliability standards, they divided the task of delineating the remaining 34 brains. The data were then spatially normalized to well-known templates using 3 popular algorithms: AIR5.2.5's nonlinear warp (Woods et al., 1998) paired with the ICBM452 Warp 5 atlas (Rex et al., 2003), FSL's FLIRT (Smith et al., 2004) was paired with its own template, a skull-stripped version of the ICBM152 T1 average; and SPM5's unified segmentation method (Ashburner and Friston, 2005) was paired with its canonical brain, the whole head ICBM152 T1 average. We thus produced 3 variants of our atlas, where each was constructed from 40 representative samples of a data processing stream that one might use for analysis. For each normalization algorithm, the individual structure delineations were then resampled according to the computed transformations. We next computed averages at each voxel location to estimate the probability of that voxel belonging to each of the 56 structures. Each version of the atlas contains, for every voxel, probability densities for each region, thus providing a resource for automated probabilistic labeling of external data types registered into standard spaces; we also computed average intensity images and tissue density maps based on the three methods and target spaces. These atlases will serve as a resource for diverse applications including meta-analysis of functional and structural imaging data and other bioinformatics applications where display of arbitrary labels in probabilistically defined anatomic space will facilitate both knowledge-based development and visualization of findings from multiple disciplines.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2757616 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.031 | DOI Listing |
Front Hum Neurosci
July 2023
Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Background: The open-access UManitoba-JHU functionally defined human white matter (WM) atlas contains specific WM pathways and general WM regions underlying 12 functional brain networks in ICBM152 template space. However, it is not known whether any of these WM networks are disproportionately co-localized with periventricular and/or juxtacortical WM (PVWM and JCWM), which could potentially impact their ability to infer network-specific effects in future studies-particularly in patient populations expected to have disproportionate PVWM and/or JCWM damage.
Methods: The current study therefore identified intersecting regions of PVWM and JCWM (defined as WM within 5 mm of the ventricular and cortical boundaries) and: (1) the ICBM152 global WM mask, and (2) all 12 UManitoba-JHU WM networks.
Sensors (Basel)
February 2023
Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is an important non-invasive technique used to monitor cortical activity. However, a varying sensitivity of surface channels vs. cortical structures may suggest integrating the fNIRS with the subject-specific anatomy (SSA) obtained from routine MRI.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Med
January 2023
Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Background: Tumor treating fields (TTFields) is an FDA-approved adjuvant therapy for glioblastoma. The distribution of an applied electric field has been shown to be governed by distinct tissue structures and electrical conductivity. Of all the tissues the skull plays a significant role in modifying the distribution of the electric field due to its large impedance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Data
May 2022
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Magnetic resonance image (MRI) processing pipelines use average templates to enable standardization of individual MRIs in a common space. MNI-ICBM152 is currently used as the standard template by most MRI processing tools. However, MNI-ICBM152 represents an average of 152 healthy young adult brains and is vastly different from brains of patients with neurodegenerative diseases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Data
August 2021
McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec (QC), Canada.
Standard templates are widely used in human neuroimaging processing pipelines to facilitate group-level analyses and comparisons across subjects/populations. MNI-ICBM152 template is the most commonly used standard template, representing an average of 152 healthy young adult brains. However, in patients with neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal dementia (FTD), high atrophy levels lead to significant differences between individuals' brain shapes and MNI-ICBM152 template.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!