Thorough disinfection of the root canal system is essential for the success of root canal therapy. This requires the use of an intra-canal medicament. Enterococcus faecalis is the most frequently found species in persistent/secondary intracanal infection associated endodontic treatment failure. This study evaluates the disinfection of dentinal tubules using 2% chlorhexidine gel, 2% metronidazole gel, bioactive glass (S53P4) in comparison with calcium hydroxide. The antibacterial efficacy of the four medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis was assessed in vitro using extracted premolar teeth at the depths of 200 microm and 400 microm. The overall percentage inhibition of bacterial growth (at 200 microm and 400 microm depth) was 100% with 2% chlorhexidine gel. The inhibition of growth was moderate with 2% metronidazole gel (86.5%), followed by bioactive glass (62.8%) and calcium hydroxide (58.5%). It can be concluded from the present study that 2% chlorhexidine gel alone was most effective against E. faecalis when compared to other medicaments tested.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.08.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bioactive glass
12
calcium hydroxide
12
chlorhexidine gel
12
disinfection dentinal
8
dentinal tubules
8
tubules chlorhexidine
8
root canal
8
enterococcus faecalis
8
metronidazole gel
8
200 microm
8

Similar Publications

Chronic osteomyelitis of the maxillofacial bones (i.e., jaw bones) is a persistent infection that requires effective treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

While bioactive glasses (BaGs) have been studied mainly for bone applications, studies have also shown their potential for soft tissue engineering. Incorporating therapeutic ions, such as lithium (Li), strontium (Sr), and boron (B) into the BaGs, has been found to promote angiogenesis and wound healing. However, a systematic study on the impact of Li, Sr, B, and the other ions in the BaGs, has not been conducted on a wide range of cells.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Trends in pH-Triggered Strategies for Dental Resins Aiming to Assist in Preventing demineralization: a scoping review.

J Dent

December 2024

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. ZIP Code: 21941-617. Electronic address:

Objectives: To identify and map the literature on the current state of pH-triggered strategies for resin-based materials used in direct restorative dentistry, focusing on innovative compounds, their incorporation and evaluation methods, and the main outcomes.

Data And Sources: Through a search across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, LILACS, Cochrane Library databases, and Google Scholar, this review identified studies pertinent to pH-responsive dental materials, excluding resin-modified glass ionomer cements.

Study Selection: From the 981 records identified, 19 in vitro studies were included, concentrating on resin-based composite resins (50%), dentin adhesives (25%), and sealants (25%).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of laser fluorescence (LF) readings in detection of caries removal by various techniques (CRTs).

Methods: A hundred and eighty extracted human molar teeth included in the study which were scored 3, 4, and 5 according to ICDAS. Each score group was randomly assigned to 4 subgroups according to CRT including ceramic bur (Group A), carbide bur (Group B), carbide bur with alumina abrasion (Group C), and carbide bur with bioactive glass (BAG) abrasion (Group D) (n = 15 for each group).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The bioactive glass-ceramic spacer (BGS)-7, a biosynthetic intervertebral fusion material introduced in 2014, has not been the subject of comparative clinical studies on anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. This study, for the first time, aims to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of the renewed BGS-7, released in 2019, with those of an allograft spacer. The comparison includes a finite element analysis of the biomechanical properties of each implant, adding a novel dimension to the research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!