The mesenteric and antimesenteric site of the tumor as possible prognostic factor in colorectal cancer: 5-year survival analysis.

Surg Oncol

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Azienda-Ospedaliera Polo Universitario, Ospedale di Circolo-Fondazione, Viale Borri 57, 21100-Varese, Italy.

Published: December 2007

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is still one of the many factors of death both in males and in females. To date, the most important prognostic factors are mainly related to the pathological stage of the disease.

Aim Of The Study: The purpose of this study was to analyze the possible role of tumor circumferential localization on the colonic wall (mesenteric (M) or antimesenteric (AM)) as a possible prognostic factor. In this study, we compare the localization of the tumor with patient's survival. The hypothesis of this study is that M tumors, closer to blood and lymphatic vessels, should be more aggressive in terms of hematogenous and lymphatic spread compared to the AM tumors.

Patients And Methods: All patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study; there was no statistical difference for age, sex and co-morbidity. The histopathological examination was carried out in the standard manner. Next, we have taken care to survival of neoplastic patients by examining of our 5-year follow-up archive: we divided patients in different groups concerning the different tumor stage and we compare these results with the different localizations of tumor at the operation.

Results: In 45% of cases, we were able to distinguish the different localizations M (160 patients) or AM (47 patients) and this difference is statistically significant (P<0.0001, Pearson Chi-Square-test (PCS-t)). The number of metastatic nodes is statistically higher in the M group compared to the AM group one (P=0.003949). Medium time of follow-up was 36.54 months; AM and M patients have a rather similar survival, only at the end the two curves seem to change but not in a significant manner. Only if we consider the difference between the two groups comparing T3 tumor can we observe a statistically significant difference (P<0.005).

Conclusions: In conclusion, the localization of M or AM colorectal cancer is feasible in 45% of cases. M tumors have significantly more lymph nodes metastases but a better 5-year survival than AM tumors. A possible explanation for such results might be the different pattern of diffusion of cancer cells.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2007.10.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colorectal cancer
12
mesenteric antimesenteric
8
prognostic factor
8
tumor
5
study
5
patients
5
antimesenteric site
4
site tumor
4
tumor prognostic
4
factor colorectal
4

Similar Publications

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication in colorectal surgery, particularly following rectal cancer surgery, necessitating effective prevention strategies. The increasing frequency of colorectal resections and anastomoses during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal carcinomatosis further complicates this issue owing to the diverse patient populations with varied tumor distributions and surgical complexities. This study aims to assess and compare AL incidence and associated risk factors across conventional colorectal cancer surgery (CRC), gastrointestinal CRS (GI-CRS), and ovarian CRS (OC-CRS), with a secondary focus on evaluating the role of protective ostomies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Circular RNAs in cancer: roles, mechanisms, and therapeutic potential across colorectal, gastric, liver, and lung carcinomas.

Discov Oncol

January 2025

Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Niwai-Tonk, Rajasthan, 304022, India.

The prominence of circular RNAs (circRNAs) has surged in cancer research due to their distinctive properties and impact on cancer development. This review delves into the role of circRNAs in four key cancer types: colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), liver cancer (HCC), and lung cancer (LUAD). The focus lies on their potential as cancer biomarkers and drug targets.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with rectal cancer often experience adverse effects on urinary, sexual, and digestive functions. Despite recognised impacts and available treatments, they are not fully integrated into follow-up protocols, thereby hindering appropriate interventions. The aim of the study was to discern the activities conducted in our routine clinical practice outside of clinical trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) significantly influence tumor progression and therapeutic resistance in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the distributions and functions of CAF subpopulations vary across the four consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of CRC. This study performed single-cell RNA and bulk RNA sequencing and revealed that myofibroblast-like CAFs (myCAFs), tumor-like CAFs (tCAFs), inflammatory CAFs (iCAFs), CXCL14CAFs, and MTCAFs are notably enriched in CMS4 compared with other CMSs of CRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

ATRX loss inhibits DDR to strengthen radio-sensitization in p53-deficent HCT116 cells.

Sci Rep

January 2025

NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology (Jilin University), School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, People's Republic of China.

Identifying novel targets for molecular radiosensitization is critical for improving the efficacy of colorectal cancer (CRC) radiotherapy. Alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX), a member of the SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeling protein family, functions in the maintenance of genomic integrity and the regulation of apoptosis and senescence. However, whether ATRX is directly involved in the radiosensitivity of CRC remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!