AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Purpose: High-frequency ultrasound energy was introduced in gastrointestinal surgery to improve dissection and coagulation. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ultrasonic dissection compared with standard electrosurgery in gastrectomy for large gastric cancers, which is associated with high morbidity.

Methods: The subjects of this retrospective study were 52 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancers, > or =7 cm in diameter. Gastrectomy was performed with ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) between January 2005 and June 2006 (UAS group, n = 26) and with standard electrosurgery between July 2003 and December 2004 (control group, n = 26). We compared morbidity, operating time, and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups.

Results: The mean operating time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly lower in the UAS group than in the control group. Morbidity in the UAS group was also lower, but the difference was not significant.

Conclusion: Our findings showed that UAS gastrectomy was safe, with significantly shorter operating times and less intraoperative blood loss than standard electrosurgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3551-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gastric cancers
12
standard electrosurgery
12
uas group
12
intraoperative blood
12
blood loss
12
ultrasonically activated
8
activated shears
8
gastrectomy large
8
large gastric
8
control group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!