AI Article Synopsis
- The study examined how distraction affects children, young adults, and elderly individuals during an auditory task, revealing that children had slower reaction times and lower performance compared to adults.
- Changes in tone pitch created distractions that impacted all age groups similarly, but these distractions prompted different responses in their brain activity.
- The results suggest that restoring focus after distractions takes longer for children and that older adults also take more time for involuntary attention-switching compared to younger adults.
Article Abstract
Behavioral and event-related potential measures of distraction and reorientation were obtained from children (6 years), young (19-24 years) and elderly adults (62-82 years) in an auditory distraction-paradigm. Participants performed a go/nogo duration discrimination task on a sequence of short and long (50-50%) tones. In children, reaction times were longer and discrimination (d') scores were lower than in adults. Occasionally (15%), the pitch of the presented tones was changed. The task-irrelevant feature variation resulted in longer reaction times and lower d' scores with no significant differences between the three groups. Task-irrelevant changes affected the N1 amplitude and elicited the mismatch negativity, N2b, P3 and reorienting negativity (RON) sequence of event-related brain potentials. In children, the P3 latency was the same as in young adults. However the RON component was delayed by about 100ms. In the elderly, P3 and RON were uniformly delayed by about 80ms compared to young adults. This pattern of results provides evidence that distraction influences different processing stages in the three groups. Restoration of the task-optimal attention set was delayed in children, whereas in the elderly, the triggering of involuntary attention-switching required longer time.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.10.003 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Foraging and inertia: understanding the developmental dynamics of overt visual attention.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
December 2024
BabyDevLab, School of Psychology, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK.
During early life, we develop the ability to choose what we focus on and what we ignore, allowing us to regulate perception and action in complex environments. But how does this change influence how we spontaneously allocate attention to real-world objects during free behaviour? Here, in this narrative review, we examine this question by considering the time dynamics of spontaneous overt visual attention, and how these develop through early life. Even in early childhood, visual attention shifts occur both periodically and aperiodically.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAuditory distraction, time perception, and the role of age: ERP evidence from a large cohort study.
Neurobiol Aging
December 2024
Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Bochum/Marburg, Germany.
Cognitive aging is typically associated with a higher susceptibility to distraction by concurrent, but task-irrelevant stimuli. Here, we studied the cognitive sub-processes involved in a sample of 484 healthy adults aged 20-70 years from the Dortmund Vital Study (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05155397).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCognitive load during driving: EEG microstate metrics are sensitive to task difficulty and predict safety outcomes.
Accid Anal Prev
November 2024
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Electronic address:
Engaging in phone conversations or other cognitively challenging tasks while driving detrimentally impacts cognitive functions and has been associated with increased risk of accidents. Existing EEG methods have been shown to differentiate between load and no load, but not between different levels of cognitive load. Furthermore, it has not been investigated whether EEG measurements of load can be used to predict safety outcomes in critical events.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActive exploration in virtual reality (VR) involves users navigating immersive virtual environments, going from one place to another. While navigating, users often engage in secondary tasks that require attentional resources, as in the case of distracted driving. Inspired by research generally studying the effects of task demands on cybersickness (CS), we investigated how the attentional demands specifically associated with secondary tasks performed during exploration affect CS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArticle Synopsis
- Distractions can hinder our focus, so self-regulation—managing attention, thoughts, and behavior—is essential for achieving goals.
- A new desktop application supports self-regulation by allowing users to set work goals, providing feedback on distractions, and rewarding focused behavior.
- This approach, based on real-life situations rather than artificial tasks, has shown to improve attention control, motivation, and self-control, helping users meet their long-term objectives.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!