Objective: Little is known regarding the relationship between social evaluation-induced neuroendocrine responses and generosity in game-theoretic situations. Previous studies demonstrated that reputation formation plays a pivotal role in prosocial behavior. This study aimed to examine the relationships between a social evaluation-induced salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) response and generosity in the dictator game. The relationship is potentially important in neuroeconomics of altruism and game theory.
Methods: We assessed sAA and allocated money in the dictator game in male students with and without social evaluation. RESULTS Social evaluation-responders allocated significantly more money than controls; while there was no significant correlation between social evaluation-induced sAA elevation and the allocated money.
Conclusions: Social evaluation significantly increases generosity in the dictator game, and individual differences in trait characteristics such as altruism and reward sensitivity may be important determinants of generosity in the dictator game task.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Sci Rep
December 2024
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wealth inequality is one of the most profound challenges confronting society today. However, an important issue in addressing inequality lies in formalizing the diversity of individual perspectives regarding what constitutes a fair distribution of resources. We tackle this topic by simulating wealth inequality through the allocation of bonus endowments in both Dictator Game (DG) and Ultimatum Game (UG) settings and capturing distributive decisions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBehavioral decision-making research has been exceptionally useful in the quest of the social sciences to understand human nature. A frequent assumption of this research is that using strangers as anonymous interaction partners allows for the clearest demonstration of human nature. But a diverse array of literature - from social and clinical psychology to ethology - suggests that a stranger is far from a "baseline partner.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychoneuroendocrinology
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt, Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Hindenburgdamm 30, Berlin 12203, Germany; DZPG (German Center for Mental Health), Berlin, Germany. Electronic address:
Evol Psychol
October 2024
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Evidence is abundant that evolution by selection has produced sex differences in the design of adaptations to solve the problems surrounding reproduction. A prime example is the design of human jealousy, which research suggests is triggered by distinct evoking acts that are specific challenges for women and men in their exclusive reproductive bond. It follows that jealousy would be directed toward driving away interlopers who could potentially threaten the bond with the romantic partner or increase mate retention efforts in response to sex-specific threats.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSoc Cogn Affect Neurosci
October 2024
Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom.
Attributing motives to others is a crucial aspect of mentalizing, can be biased by prejudice, and is affected by common psychiatric disorders. It is therefore important to understand in depth the mechanisms underpinning it. Toward improving models of mentalizing motives, we hypothesized that people quickly infer whether other's motives are likely beneficial or detrimental, then refine their judgment (classify-refine).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!