Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are common practice, despite controversy regarding benefits. A review of the literature from 1950 to 2006 revealed 3 randomized controlled trials evaluated the treatment of GDM but 2 of these studies lacked power to detect a difference in outcomes. The single trial with sufficient power showed a 67% lower rate of serious perinatal complication (a composite of shoulder dystocia, nerve injury, fracture, and death) and a 53% lower rate of macrosomia with treatment of GDM. There are no well-designed studies evaluating screening or diagnostic strategies. Treatment of GDM may improve some neonatal and obstetric outcomes, but there is limited evidence useful for determining the best screening method or diagnostic test, strategy, and criteria. Ongoing studies may provide some evidence to guide future research and clinical practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e31815a5510 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!