A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of dosimetric parameters for various 192Ir brachytherapy sources under unbounded phantom geometry by Monte Carlo simulation. | LitMetric

As per TG-43 dose calculation formalism, it is essential to obtain various dosimetric parameters such as the air-kerma strength, dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function, as they account for accurate determination of dose rate distribution around brachytherapy sources. Most of the available reported Monte Carlo simulations were performed in liquid water phantoms with a bounded region of 30-cm diameter. In this context, an attempt was made to report the dosimetric parameters for various commercially available pulsed-dose rate (PDR) and high-dose rate (HDR) sources under unbounded phantom conditions, as the data may be used as input to treatment planning systems (TPSs) for quality control assistance. The air-kerma strength per unit activity, S(k)/A, was computed for various Iridium-192 ((192)Ir) sources in dry air medium. The air-kerma strength and dose rate constant for old PDR is (9.77 +/- 0.03) 10(-8) U/Bq and 1.124 +/- 0.001 cGyh(-1)U(-1); for new PDR, the values are (9.96 +/- 0.03) 10(-8) U/Bq and 1.124 +/- 0.001 cGyh(-1)U(-1); for old MHDR, the values are (9.80 +/- 0.01) 10(-8) U/Bq and 1.115 +/- 0.001 cGyh(-1)U(-1); for new MHDR, (9.80 +/- 0.01) 10(-8) U/Bq and 1.112 +/- 0.001cGyh(-1)U(-1); for old VHDR, the values are (10.32 +/- 0.01) 10(-8) U/Bq and 1.035 +/- 0.002 cGyh(-1)U(-1); for new VHDR, the values are (10.34 +/- 0.02) 10(-8) U/Bq and 1.096 +/- 0.001 cGyh(-1)U(-1). The computed radial dose function values and anisotropy function values are also in good agreement with available data.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2007.03.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

10-8 u/bq
24
+/- 0001
16
0001 cgyh-1u-1
16
dosimetric parameters
12
air-kerma strength
12
dose rate
12
+/-
12
+/- 001
12
001 10-8
12
brachytherapy sources
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!