A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Determinants of airleak flow during humming V high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in an open-compartment ex-vivo model of airleak. | LitMetric

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) using small tidal volumes and maintaining sufficient end-expiratory lung volume may be beneficial in the treatment of airleak. However, few published guidelines exist to advise clinicians on appropriate ventilator settings in this clinical scenario. The present experiment aimed to determine the effect of frequency, stroke volume (SV) and mean airway pressure (MAP) on airleak from an isolated lung model ventilated with a Humming V HFOV. We performed a crossover non-randomized experiment using the repeated measurement method to test the hypothesis that MAP is the major determinate for airleak. The lungs of 13 healthy juvenile New Zealand white rabbits were isolated and ventilated with high peak pressure to create airleak. The dataset obtained was analyzed using the generalized estimating equation method. We found that airleak flow did not change as frequency was raised from 13 to 17 Hz (P = 0.463) with MAP and SV kept constant. SV was positively correlated to the amount of change in airleak (P < 0.01, coefficients +/- SEM = 1.2 +/- 0.1 ml/min/ml). Leakage flow increased significantly from 275 +/- 168 ml/min to 1,721 +/- 552 ml/min as MAP was increased from 5 cm H(2)O to 30 cm H(2)O (P < 0.001, coefficients +/- SEM = 56.1 +/- 3.0 ml/min/cm H(2)O) while inspiratory flow increased less and amplitude pressure remained about the same. We concluded that MAP (lung volume) was the main independent factor for airleak, whilst SV (tidal volume) exerted a lesser effect. Within the operational range of the Humming V, frequency did not affect airleak.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.20669DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

airleak
9
airleak flow
8
high-frequency oscillatory
8
oscillatory ventilation
8
lung volume
8
coefficients +/-
8
+/- sem
8
flow increased
8
+/-
6
map
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!