Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Since the findings of Murry and Currie et al. that ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and heat shock response (HSR) could protect evidently myocardium against ischemia-reperfusion injury in the middle of 1980s, endogenous myocardial protection has drawn widespread attentions. A great quantity of studies completed during the past 25 years made much progress in endogenous myocardial protection. Abundant research experiences have been accumulated and a basic theoretical framework has been established in this field. However, there are still many questions need to be solved. In this review, we focused on clarifying some hot questions and important future directions in IPC, heat shock proteins (HSPs), research models and strategies in endogenous myocardial protection.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!