A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Assessment of a point-of-care lactate monitor in emergency admissions of adult horses to a referral hospital. | LitMetric

Assessment of a point-of-care lactate monitor in emergency admissions of adult horses to a referral hospital.

J Vet Intern Med

Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, 382 West Street Road, Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA.

Published: December 2007

Background: Blood lactate concentration [LAC] is considered a useful indicator of disease severity in horses. Agreement of point-of-care (POC) lactate monitors with laboratory standards has not been established for clinically abnormal horses.

Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that results from a POC lactate monitor would be in agreement with a laboratory-based measurement of [LAC].

Animals: The study included adult horses presented for emergency evaluation.

Methods: A prospective observational study was performed. [LAC] was measured with whole blood (AWB) and plasma (APL) by means of a POC monitor (Accutrend) and compared with results from whole blood measured by a laboratory blood gas analyzer (NOVA).

Results: Samples from 221 horses were used to compare the 2 lactate measurement techniques. Agreement (p +/- SE) was closest between APL and NOVA (0.97 +/- 0.01); an average observed difference of 0.15 +/- 0.89 (mean +/- SD) and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) -1.89, 1.59 also were found. Agreement was preserved and 95% LOA further decreased in horses with NOVA [LAC] of <5 mM and PCV <40%. Agreement was modest when testing whole blood samples on the POC monitor with increased 95% LOA.

Conclusions And Clinical Importance: Results indicate close agreement between NOVA and the POC monitor when [LAC] was measured with plasma. Results were less consistent at higher [LAC] but sufficiently reliable to follow trends. Although whole blood may be used with the POC monitor to identify clinically important hyperlactatemia, results may be insufficiently reliable to monitor trends.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1892/0891-6640(2007)21[1090:aoaplm]2.0.co;2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lactate monitor
8
adult horses
8
poc lactate
8
lactate
5
horses
5
agreement
5
assessment point-of-care
4
point-of-care lactate
4
monitor emergency
4
emergency admissions
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!