A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. | LitMetric

The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

BJU Int

Section of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

Published: March 2008

Objective: To evaluate the effect of prostate weight on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).

Patients And Methods: Between January 2003 and January 2006, 327 patients had LRP by one surgeon, 193 of whom were available for analysis. Patients were stratified into three groups on the basis of pathological prostate weight, i.e. or=75 g. Perioperative, oncological and functional (continence and potency at 1 year) outcomes were compared among the three groups.

Results: Of the 193 patients the prostate was or=75 g in 44 (23%); the mean prostate weight was 27, 49 and 98 g in the three subgroups, respectively. At presentation, 144 patients (75%) had T1c disease, 159 (82%) were potent and 187 (97%) were continent. Unilateral nerve-sparing was done in 37 (19%) and bilateral in 114 (59%) patients. The three subgroups were comparable in age, body mass index, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, preoperative Gleason score, clinical stage, operative duration, length of hospital stay, duration of catheterization, biochemical recurrence and continence after LRP. In the patients with a prostate of
Conclusions: Prostate size has no effect on continence or biochemical recurrence at 1 year after LRP, but affects intraoperative blood loss, potency and surgical margins. More patients with a longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07263.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate weight
16
outcomes laparoscopic
8
laparoscopic radical
8
radical prostatectomy
8
patients prostate
8
three subgroups
8
prostate
6
patients
6
weight outcomes
4
prostatectomy objective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!