Eye dominance and response latency in area V1 of the monkey.

Vis Neurosci

Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Published: December 2007

We measured the latency of 35 cells from V1 in two rhesus monkeys, to dynamic random dot stimuli monocular and binocularly presented. Mean latencies after non-dominant eye stimulation (97.9 ms) were longer than those for dominant eye (78.2 ms) and binocular (70.7 ms) stimulation. Differences between latencies for dominant eye and binocular stimulation were not statistically significant. For dominant eye, there was a significant statistical correlation between dominance strength and latency (R = -0.36; p = 0.03). We failed to find significant statistical differences between latencies for cells with temporal and nasal dominant receptive-field. We conclude that, in V1, the response latency is largely determined by the dominant eye, whereas interocular interactions do not seem to play a relevant role regarding response latency.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523807070642DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dominant eye
16
response latency
12
differences latencies
8
eye
6
latency
5
dominant
5
eye dominance
4
dominance response
4
latency area
4
area monkey
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!