AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the safety and immune response of ZOSTAVAX given either at the same time as the flu vaccine or sequentially in adults aged 50 and older.
  • There were no serious adverse events linked to ZOSTAVAX, and the immune responses for varicella-zoster virus antibodies were found to be noninferior between the two vaccination schedules.
  • Both vaccination groups demonstrated comparable immune responses to the influenza strains tested, suggesting that administering both vaccines together is safe and effective.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of ZOSTAVAX administered concomitantly with inactivated influenza vaccine or sequentially in adults aged 50 and older.

Design: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study.

Setting: Thirteen U.S. and seven European study sites.

Participants: Three hundred eighty-two concomitantly, 380 sequentially vaccinated subjects.

Intervention: The concomitant vaccination group received influenza vaccine and ZOSTAVAX at separate injection sites on Day 1 and placebo at Week 4. The nonconcomitant vaccination group received influenza vaccine and placebo at separate injection sites on Day 1 and ZOSTAVAX at Week 4.

Measurements: Primary safety endpoints: vaccine-related serious adverse experiences (AEs) within 28 days postvaccination (PV); and diary card-prompted local and systemic AEs. Primary immunogenicity endpoints: geometric mean titer (GMT) and geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) from baseline of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibody (Ab) at 4 weeks PV according to glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA) and GMT of influenza Ab for the three vaccine strains (2005-2006 influenza season) at 4 weeks PV according to hemagglutination inhibition assay. Secondary immunogenicity endpoint: influenza seroconversion rates (SCRs).

Results: No serious AEs related to ZOSTAVAX were observed during the study. VZV Ab GMTs 4 weeks PV for the concomitant and sequential groups were 554 and 597 gpELISA U/mL, respectively. The estimated VZV Ab GMT ratio was 0.9 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.8-1.0), indicating noninferior (P<.001 for the null hypothesis of GMT ratio <0.67) responses. Estimated VZV Ab GMFR from baseline in the concomitant group was 2.1 (95% CI=2.0-2.3), indicating acceptable fold rise. Estimated GMT ratios (concomitant/sequential) for influenza strains A(H1N1), A(H3N2), and B were 0.9 (95% CI=0.8-1.1), 1.1 (95% CI=0.9-1.3), and 0.9 (95% CI=0.8-1.1), respectively, and SCRs were comparable across both groups, with more than 85% achieving titers of 1:40 or greater, meeting regulatory criteria.

Conclusion: ZOSTAVAX and influenza vaccine given concomitantly are generally well tolerated in adults aged 50 and older. Ab responses were similar whether ZOSTAVAX and influenza vaccine were given concomitantly or sequentially.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01397.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

influenza vaccine
16
safety immunogenicity
8
inactivated influenza
8
adults aged
8
vaccination group
8
group received
8
received influenza
8
separate injection
8
injection sites
8
sites day
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!