A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Physical characteristics of next-generation ureteral access sheaths: buckling and kinking. | LitMetric

Physical characteristics of next-generation ureteral access sheaths: buckling and kinking.

Urology

Department of Urologic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0392, USA.

Published: September 2007

Objective: To evaluate physical characteristics of next-generation access sheaths that impact clinical failure.

Methods: Testing of the Cook Flexor (12/14 Fr x 35 cm, Cook), ACMI UroPass (12/14 Fr x 38 cm, ACMI), Bard Aquaguide (11/13 Fr x 35 cm Bard), and Boston Scientific Navigator (11/13 Fr x 36 cm BSCI-11, 13/15 Fr x 36 cm BSCI-13) was performed on a linear motion stage driven by a stepper motor with a resolution of 5 microm per step. Force was measured at a sampling rate of 5 Hz with a Wagner FDIX digital force gauge. Friction force was measured by pulling sheaths at 2.5 mm/s through 2.78 mm (8.3 Fr) holes drilled in 36 mm thick biologic material. Buckling force was measured as the force required to compress a 25-cm length of sheath in a clamp-clamp configuration during a 30 mm move. Kinking was measured as the slope of the force-deflection curve for wall compression over a deflection of 2 mm.

Results: No significant difference was noted in the friction force of the Cook (1.2 N), Bard (1.3 N), BSCI-11 (1.0 N), and BSCI-13 (1.0 N). Buckling force was significantly greater for the Cook (5.1 +/- 0.49 N) than the Bard (2.8 +/- 0.31 N), BSCI-11 (2.0 +/- 0.25 N), ACMI (3.2 +/- 0.33 N), and BSCI-13 (2.9 +/- 0.31 N). Kinking force was significantly lower with the Bard (9 N/mm) than the Cook (42 N/mm), BSCI-11 (41 N/mm), and BSCI-13 (30 N/mm), and significantly higher with the ACMI (83 N/mm).

Conclusions: The Cook Flexor sheath is most resistant to buckling forces that would predict failure to advance up the ureter. The Bard Aquaglide is most likely to kink after removal of the inner obturator, whereas the ACMI Uropass is most resistant to kinking.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

force measured
12
physical characteristics
8
characteristics next-generation
8
access sheaths
8
cook flexor
8
acmi uropass
8
force
8
friction force
8
buckling force
8
+/- 031
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!