Automated left ventricular capture management.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

Mid-State Cardiology Associates, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Published: October 2007

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focused on a new algorithm for measuring stimulation thresholds in left ventricular leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
  • Researchers enrolled 134 patients and compared automatic measurements from this algorithm with manual testing during follow-ups.
  • Results showed that the algorithm was highly accurate and reliable, effectively ensuring continuous ventricular capture while potentially extending the device's lifespan.

Article Abstract

Background: The stimulation thresholds of left ventricular (LV) leads tend to be less reliable than conventional leads. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires continuous capture of both ventricles.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel algorithm for the automatic measurement of the stimulation threshold of LV leads in cardiac resynchronization systems.

Methods: We enrolled 134 patients from 18 centers who had existing CRT-D systems. Software capable of automatically executing LV threshold measurements was downloaded into the random access memory (RAM) of the device. The threshold was measured by pacing in the left ventricle and analyzing the interventricular conduction sensed in the right ventricle. Automatic LV threshold measurements were collected and compared with manual LV threshold tests at each follow-up visit and using a Holter monitor system that recorded both the surface electrocardiograph (ECG) and continuous telemetry from the device.

Results: The proportion of Left Ventricular Capture Management (LVCM) in-office threshold tests within one programming step of the manual threshold test was 99.7% (306/307) with a two-sided 95% confidence interval of (98.2%, 100.0%). The algorithm measured the threshold successfully in 96% and 97% of patients after 1 and 3 months respectively. Holter monitor analysis in a subset of patients revealed accurate performance of the algorithm.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the LVCM algorithm is safe, accurate, and highly reliable. LVCM worked with different types of leads and different lead locations. LVCM was demonstrated to be clinically equivalent to the manual LV threshold test. LVCM offers automatic measurement, output adaptation, and trends of the LV threshold and should result in improved ability to maintain LV capture without sacrificing device longevity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00840.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

left ventricular
12
manual threshold
12
threshold
10
ventricular capture
8
capture management
8
leads cardiac
8
cardiac resynchronization
8
automatic measurement
8
threshold measurements
8
threshold tests
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!