A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Carotid endarterectomy in the elderly. | LitMetric

Carotid endarterectomy in the elderly.

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis

Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA; Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Ciccinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA.

Published: October 2012

Background And Purpose: Increasing life expectancy has resulted in an increasing number of elderly. As the elderly population grows, the incidence of stroke will increase. Many such strokes result from carotid stenosis (CS). In view of the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) shown in recent clinical trials, it would seem prudent that surgery for CS be considered for prevention of stroke in this population. Traditionally, members of the geriatric population have often been viewed, perhaps arbitrarily, as inappropriate candidates for CEA because of perceived greater operative risks. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of performing CEA in geriatric patients.

Patients And Methods: A total of 175 patients who underwent CEA between January 1994 and June 1996 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into the nongeriatric group (NGG <75 years of age) and the geriatric group (GG >75 years of age). There were 90 (51%) patients in the NGG and 85 (49%) in the GG. The two groups were compared for the following: rationale for surgery (symptomatic vs. asymptomatic), risk factor profile, preoperative imaging studies (noninvasive vs. invasive), and complications of surgery.

Results: Both groups were generally comparable in terms of their risk factors, rationale for surgery, and preoperative cardiac risk. Noninvasive imaging alone was used in 56% of NGG and 60% of GG patients, whereas 44% of NGG and 40% of GG underwent invasive cerebral angiography in addition to other noninvasive studies. There were 4(4.4%) postoperative neurological complications, including two strokes and two transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), in the NGG and 1(1%) stroke in the GG. One patient died in the NGG from a stroke. Although one patient in the GG experienced a postoperative myocardial infarction, there was no mortality in this group.

Conclusion: CEA can be safely performed for both symptomatic and asymptomatic CS in appropriately selected patients irrespective of age.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1052-3057(99)80036-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carotid endarterectomy
8
rationale surgery
8
symptomatic asymptomatic
8
stroke patient
8
ngg
6
cea
5
patients
5
endarterectomy elderly
4
elderly background
4
background purpose
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!