Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Outbreaks with Enterobacter spp. have been described frequently in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). This study investigated the factors that determine whether a neonate becomes colonised with Enterobacter spp., how long colonisation continues and whether the termination of isolation measures leads to spread of the organism. Neonates transferred from the NICUs of tertiary care hospitals were screened for the presence of Enterobacter spp. and any potential predictors for colonisation recorded. Those infected were monitored during their hospital stay and colonised neonates were screened every month for six months. Isolation infection control precautions were lifted and all neonates were screened for the presence of Enterobacter spp. six and 12 months later. Fifteen colonised neonates and 33 non-colonised controls were identified for study. Multivariate analysis showed that antibiotic therapy for more than three days and an Apgar score of <8 after 1 min were independently associated with Enterobacter spp. colonisation. Molecular typing using single-enzyme amplified-fragment length polymorphism (seAFLP) analysis revealed 22 different seAFLP genotypes. Three infants remained colonised with the same Enterobacter genotype after discharge; however, most neonates lost their strain or became colonised with another genotype. Lifting infection control measures for neonates colonised with Enterobacter spp. in a neonatal ward did not lead to increased incidence of colonisation and none of the infants became infected. Isolating neonates with susceptible Enterobacter spp. was not found to be necessary.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2007.07.018 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!