A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Optimisation of intradermal DNA electrotransfer for immunisation. | LitMetric

Optimisation of intradermal DNA electrotransfer for immunisation.

J Control Release

Université catholique de Louvain, Unité de pharmacie galénique, Avenue Emmanuel Mounier, 73 UCL, 7320, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.

Published: December 2007

The development of DNA vaccines requires appropriate delivery technologies. Electrotransfer is one of the most efficient methods of non-viral gene transfer. In the present study, intradermal DNA electrotransfer was first optimised. Strong effects of the injection method and the dose of DNA on luciferase expression were demonstrated. Pre-treatments were evaluated to enhance DNA diffusion in the skin but neither hyaluronidase injection nor iontophoresis improved efficiency of intradermal DNA electrotransfer. Then, DNA immunisation with a weakly immunogenic model antigen, luciferase, was investigated. After intradermal injection of the plasmid encoding luciferase, electrotransfer (HV 700 V/cm 100 micros, LV 200 V/cm 400 ms) was required to induce immune response. The response was Th1-shifted compared to immunisation with the luciferase recombinant protein. Finally, DNA electrotransfer in the skin, the muscle or the ear pinna was compared. Muscle DNA electrotransfer resulted in the highest luciferase expression and the best IgG response. Nevertheless electrotransfer into the skin, the muscle and the ear pinna all resulted in IFN-gamma secretion by luciferase-stimulated splenocytes suggesting that an efficient Th1 response was induced in all case.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.08.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dna electrotransfer
20
intradermal dna
12
dna
9
electrotransfer
8
luciferase expression
8
electrotransfer skin
8
skin muscle
8
muscle ear
8
ear pinna
8
luciferase
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!