Objective: To compare performance of pointwise linear regression, Glaucoma Change Probability Analysis (GCPA), and the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) method in predicting visual field progression in glaucoma.
Design: Longitudinal visual field data from AGIS. Proportion of progressing eyes and time to progression were the main outcome measures. One hundred fifty-six patients with 8 or more years of follow-up were included. Prediction of outcomes at 8 years was used to evaluate the performance of each method (pointwise linear regression, GCPA, and AGIS).
Results: Visual field progression at 8 years was detected in 35%, 31%, and 22% of patients by pointwise linear regression, GCPA, and the AGIS method, respectively. Baseline mean deviation was not different for nonprogressing vs progressing eyes for all methods (P > .05). Pointwise linear regression and GCPA had the highest pairwise concordance (kappa = 0.58 [SD, 0.07]). The false prediction rates at 4 and 8 years varied between 1% and 3%. Glaucoma Change Probability Analysis predicted final outcomes better than pointwise linear regression at 4 years (P = .001).
Conclusions: All algorithms had low false prediction rates. Glaucoma Change Probability Analysis predicted outcomes better than pointwise linear regression early during follow-up. Algorithms did not perform differently as a function of baseline damage. Pointwise linear regression and GCPA did not agree well regarding spatial distribution of worsening test locations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.9.1176 | DOI Listing |
J Appl Stat
May 2024
Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Ischemic stroke is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in the United States and worldwide. Stroke treatment optimization requires emergency medical personnel to make rapid triage decisions concerning destination hospitals that may differ in their ability to provide highly time-sensitive pharmaceutical and surgical interventions. These decisions are particularly crucial in rural areas, where transport decisions can have a large impact on treatment times - often involving a trade-off between delay in pharmaceutical therapy or a delay in endovascular thrombectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiom J
February 2025
Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Assessment of covariate balance is a key step when performing comparisons between groups particularly in real-world data. We generally evaluate it on baseline covariates, but rarely on longitudinal ones prior to a management decision. We could use pointwise standardized mean differences, standardized differences of slopes, or weights from the model for such purpose.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBJC Rep
September 2024
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Transl Vis Sci Technol
October 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
J Am Stat Assoc
June 2023
Professor, Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Department of Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
High dimensional linear models are commonly used in practice. In many applications, one is interested in linear transformations of regression coefficients , where is a specific point and is not required to be identically distributed as the training data. One common approach is the plug-in technique which first estimates , then plugs the estimator in the linear transformation for prediction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!