A comparison of the reproductive ability of Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata:Varroidae) in worker and drone brood of Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Exp Appl Acarol

Centro de Investigaciones Apícolas Tropicales, Universidad Nacional, 475-3000 Heredia, Costa Rica.

Published: December 2007

Colony infestation by the parasitic mite, Varroa destructor is one of the most serious problems for beekeeping worldwide. In order to reproduce varroa females, enter worker or drone brood shortly before the cell is sealed. To test the hypothesis that, due to the preference of mites to invade drone brood to reproduce, a high proportion of the mite reproduction should occur in drone cells, a comparative study of mite reproductive rate in worker and drone brood of Africanized honey bees (AHB) was done for 370 mites. After determining the number, developmental stage and sex of the offspring in worker cells, the foundress female mite was immediately transferred into an uninfested drone cell. Mite fertility in single infested worker and drone brood cells was 76.5 and 79.3%, respectively. There was no difference between the groups (X(2)= 0.78, P = 0.37). However, one of the most significant differences in mite reproduction was the higher percentage of mites producing viable offspring (cells that contain one live adult male and at least one adult female mite) in drone cells (38.1%) compared to worker cells (13.8%) (X(2)= 55.4, P < 0.01). Furthermore, a high level of immature offspring occurred in worker cells and not in drone cells (X(2)= 69, P < 0.01). Although no differences were found in the percentage of non-reproducing mites, more than 74% (n = 85) of the mites that did not reproduce in worker brood, produced offspring when they were transferred to drone brood.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-007-9102-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

drone brood
24
worker drone
16
drone cells
12
worker cells
12
drone
10
varroa destructor
8
worker
8
brood africanized
8
africanized honey
8
honey bees
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Varroa destructor, a parasite affecting honeybees, causes significant colony losses worldwide through direct feeding and disease transmission.
  • A study was conducted on 90 volunteer apiaries to determine the prevalence of varroosis and identify risk factors, finding that 66.15% of colonies were infested.
  • Results showed that weak colonies, older colonies, and those in specific agro-ecological regions faced significantly higher risks, emphasizing the need for effective control measures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study explores creating a protein powder from honey bee drone broods using a foam-mat drying method, which is beneficial for community-based projects.
  • Steamed honey bee broods showed the highest protein content, and the research optimized the powder formulation by mixing various concentrations of steamed brood and binders like glycerol monostearate and carboxymethyl cellulose.
  • Results indicated that foam-mat drying produced a stable protein powder with a decent protein content, suggesting that bee brood could serve as a sustainable and nutritious protein alternative for food security.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Implementation of marker-assisted selection (MAS) in modern beekeeping would improve sustainability, especially in breeding programs aiming for resilience against the parasitic mite . Selecting honey bee colonies for natural resistance traits, such as brood-intrinsic suppression of varroa mite reproduction, reduces the use of chemical acaricides while respecting local adaptation. In 2019, eight genomic variants associated with varroa non-reproduction in drone brood were discovered in a single colony from the Amsterdam Water Dune population in the Netherlands.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comprehensive Approach to Phenotype Reproduction in Honey Bee Drone Brood and Its Correlation with Decreased Mite Reproduction (DMR).

Insects

May 2024

Laboratory of Molecular Entomology and Bee Pathology (L-MEB), Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

The mechanisms of action behind decreased mite reproduction (DMR) are still unknown, but current hypotheses state that DMR is the result of brood-intrinsic and/or external disturbances in the -honey bee pupa signal interactions. For accurate and precise DMR phenotyping, sufficient single infested honey bee brood cells are required (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The life cycle of Varroa destructor, the ectoparasitic mite of honey bees (Apis mellifera), includes a dispersal phase, in which mites attach to adult bees for transport and feeding, and a reproductive phase, in which mites invade worker and drone brood cells just prior to pupation to reproduce while their bee hosts complete development. In this study, we wanted to determine whether increased nurse bee visitations of adjacent drone and worker brood cells would increase the likelihood of Varroa mites invading those cells. We also explored whether temporarily restricting the nurses' access to sections of worker brood for 2 or 4 h would subsequently cause higher nurse visitations, and thus, higher Varroa cell invasions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!