AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares cancer-specific mortality in patients with unclassified renal cell carcinoma (URCC) versus clear cell RCC (CRCC) following nephrectomy, highlighting the aggressive nature of URCC.
  • Among 85 patients with URCC and 4,322 with CRCC, significant differences were found, including higher Fuhrman grades and metastasis rates in URCC patients.
  • After adjusting for tumor characteristics, URCC patients had 1.6 to 1.7 times higher mortality rates compared to CRCC patients, indicating URCC's greater severity even when factors like tumor stage and grade are considered.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To compare cancer-specific mortality in patients with unclassified renal cell carcinoma (URCC) vs clear cell RCC (CRCC) after nephrectomy, as URCC is a rare but very aggressive histological subtype.

Patients And Methods: Eighty-five patients with URCC and 4322 with CRCC were identified within 6530 patients treated with either radical or partial nephrectomy at 18 institutions. Of 85 patients with URCC, 55 were matched with 166 of 4322 for grade, tumour size, and Tumour, Node and Metastasis stages. Kaplan-Meier and life-table analyses were used to address RCC-specific survival. Subsequently, multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to test for differences in RCC-specific survival in unmatched samples.

Results: Of patients with URCC, 80% had Fuhrman grades III or IV, vs 37.8% for CRCC. Moreover, 36.5% of patients with URCC had pathologically confirmed nodal metastases, vs 8.6% with CRCC. Finally, 54.1% of patients with URCC had distant metastases at the time of nephrectomy, vs 16.8% with CRCC. Despite these differences in the overall analyses, after matching for tumour characteristics, the URCC-specific mortality rate was 1.6 times higher (P = 0.04) in matched analyses and 1.7 times higher (P = 0.001) in multivariate analyses.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that URCC presents with a higher stage and grade, and even after controlling for the stage and grade differences, predisposes patients to 1.6-1.7 times the mortality of CRCC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07148.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients urcc
20
unclassified renal
8
renal cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
patients
8
urcc
8
rcc-specific survival
8
times higher
8
stage grade
8
crcc
6

Similar Publications

Sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma (BRCC) is a rare situation of RCC. The treatment for BRCC is controversial and there is a lack of authoritative guidelines about the management of BRCC. Patients diagnosed with sporadic BRCC between 2004 and 2020 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a tendency towards recurrence and limited survival. Standard-of-care in 1st-line is platinum-etoposide chemotherapy plus atezolizumab or durvalumab,based on landmarkclinical trials.

Methods: IFCT-1905 CLINATEZO is a nationwide, non-interventional, retrospectivestudy of patients with extensive-SCLC receivingatezolizumab plus chemotherapy as part of French Early Access Program.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients with chronic cough experience a high alteration of quality of life. Moreover, chronic cough is a complex entity with numerous etiologies and treatments. In order to help clinicians involved in the management of patients with chronic cough, guidelines on chronic cough have been established by a group of French experts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Guidelines for the management of chronic cough in adults].

Rev Mal Respir

May 2023

Unité de voie et déglutition, hôpital Larrey, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Patients with chronic cough experience major alteration in their quality of life. Given its numerous etiologies and treatments, this disease is a complex entity. To help clinicians involved in patient management of patients, guidelines have been issued by a group of French experts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In April 2021, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Division of Cancer Prevention collaborated with the NCI Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis to produce a virtual workshop that developed recommendations for enhancing NCI-sponsored clinical trial accrual of older adults. Prior to the workshop, a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders (eg, community oncologists, advanced practice practitioners, clinic and research staff, and patient advocates) gathered information related to accrual of older adults to clinical trials from the literature. Subsequently, a survey was conducted to detail NCI Community Oncology Research Program members' perspective on accrual barriers for this population; 305 individuals responded to the survey.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!