Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe sociodemographic factors and the occurrence of diseases and disabilities among a representative sample of clients who were using community occupational therapy services in Norway.
Method: A postal survey of occupational therapists about their last clients (n=168) was carried out in 2001. A survey questionnaire based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) was developed. Diagnoses were coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2).
Results: This study showed that more than half of the clients were adults, youths, or children. Only 17% of adults participated in "ordinary working life", and of those approximately 10% were on sick leave and 62% were on disablement pension. A predominance of neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease was found (24%). Stroke was the most common principal diagnosis (19%). Musculoskeletal (16%) and mental diseases (13%) were also frequently reported. "Movement impairments" (96%) were most common in the body function component. Frequent problems in several domains of the activity and participation components were reported, in particular in "education, work and employment" (93-94%) and "recreation and leisure" (94%).
Conclusion: Clients using community occupational therapy in Norway had numerous types of chronic and severe diseases, and a high occurrence of musculoskeletal impairment, activity limitations, and participation restrictions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11038120600968811 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Importance: Health systems are increasingly required to conduct health-related social needs screening. However, how social resources negatively and positively affect recovery from acute illnesses, such as COVID-19, is incompletely understood.
Objective: To examine how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence recovery from COVID-19.
J Bioeth Inq
January 2025
Institut für Philosophie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Norbert-Wollheim-Platz 1, 60629, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Scholars usually distinguish between testimonial and hermeneutical epistemic injustice in healthcare. The former arises from negative stereotyping and stigmatization, while the latter occurs when the hermeneutical resources of the dominant community are inadequate for articulating the experience of one's illness. However, the heuristics provided by these two types of epistemic predicaments tend to overlook salient forms of epistemic injustice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Community Genet
January 2025
Centralized Sequencing Program, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are rare heritable disorders of the immune system predisposing to atypical infections, autoimmunity, inflammation, and risk of malignancy. Adaptation is the process of incorporating stressful experiences into one's life; these experiences may include onset of illness, receiving a diagnosis, or suffering without a diagnosis. Poor adaptation is linked to adverse outcomes including psychiatric comorbidities and decreased well-being.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Vet Med Educ
December 2024
University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in veterinary medicine affects veterinarians, students, clients, and the regional availability of veterinary services. Veterinary students from 5 colleges in Canada and 5 colleges in the United States were surveyed about their challenges, experiences, and perceptions related to EDI, resulting in 456 responses (10.4%).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Trauma Acute Care Surg
January 2025
From the Department of Surgery (J.-M.V., T.W.C., B.A.C.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Epidemiology (B.L.R.-R., S.R.W.) and Department of Surgery (J.W.C.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Donald D. Trunkey Center for Civilian and Combat Casualty Care (M.A.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Surgery, Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health (E.E.M.), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado; Department of Surgery (N.N.), University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida; and Department of Surgery (J.L.S.), Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Background: Blood shortages and utilization stewardship have motivated the trauma community to evaluate futility cutoffs during massive transfusions (MTs). Recent single-center studies have confirmed meaningful survival in ultra-MT (≥20 U) and super-MT (≥50 U), while others advocate for earlier futility cut points. We sought to evaluate whether transfusion volume and intensity cut points could predict 100% mortality in a multicenter analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!