Two-piece implants with turned versus microtextured collars.

J Periodontol

Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

Published: September 2007

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Implant companies have been promoting two-piece implants with microtextured collars in the interest of hard tissue preservation and/or soft tissue integration. However, this rationale may not be justified. Based on comparative studies currently available, it is unclear whether microroughened implant necks reduce crestal bone loss. A possible effect may be overruled by the establishment of a biologic width or by other factors influencing crestal bone remodeling. In addition, the orientation and attachment of the collagen fibers in the peri-implant mucosa are a little different because the surface roughness varies at the level of the implant neck. The clinician should be cautious when using these modified implants because the impact of microtextured collars on the initiation and progression of peri-implant pathology is currently unknown.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.070065DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

microtextured collars
12
two-piece implants
8
crestal bone
8
implants turned
4
turned versus
4
versus microtextured
4
collars implant
4
implant companies
4
companies promoting
4
promoting two-piece
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!