A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Multidetector CT angiography in the follow-up of patients treated with renal artery stents: value of different reformation techniques compared with axial source images. | LitMetric

Purpose: To evaluate the role of 4 different reformation techniques in comparison with axial images from multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) in the follow-up of renal artery stents.

Methods: Data on 40 patients (20 men; mean age 65 years) who underwent MDCTA as part of their routine follow-up after successful primary stenting of a main renal artery were retrospectively analyzed. Multiplanar reformation (MPR), curved planar reformation (CPR), volume rendering threshold (VRT), and virtual angioscopy (VA) were reviewed by 2 independent observers who were blinded to the results of the axial source images, which served as the gold standard. The stenosis degree was scored as I = 0%, II <50%, III = 51%-75%, IV = 76%-99%, or V = occlusion; a stenosis >50% was considered hemodynamically significant.

Results: Five hemodynamically significant stenoses were identified on axial images. The correlation with axial images was perfect for both observers using MPR and CPR (kappa = 1 for each observer); corresponding results were kappa = 0.69 and kappa = 0.64 for VRT and kappa = 0.88 and kappa = 0.83 for VA, respectively. The interobserver correlations were excellent for all reformation techniques (kappa = 0.95 to 1).

Conclusion: Compared to axial images, MPR and CPR correlated perfectly with axial images; VA performed surprisingly well, while VRT was affected by artifacts and consequently showed inferior results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1583/06-1970.1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

axial images
20
renal artery
12
reformation techniques
12
compared axial
8
axial source
8
source images
8
mpr cpr
8
axial
7
images
7
kappa
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!