The aim of this work was to evaluate the agreement between conventional cytology (CC) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) in cervical cancer early detection. The results of CC and LBC (DNACitoliq in 2,059 women aged 25-59 years were compared. The percent agreement, kappa coefficient, prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa coefficient (PABAK), and Chamberlain's percent positive agreement (PPA) were calculated. The percent agreement between the two methods was very good (80% and 79%, respectively, for normal versus ASCUS+; and normal versus ASCUS, AGUS and LSIL+ vs. HSIL+). The kappa coefficient indicates slight agreement (0.26 and 0.23, respectively), but when PABAK was used the agreement was good (0.61 and 0.68, respectively). PPA was high for normal results (79.2%) and low for the remaining categories. To conclude, in this study, agreement between LBC and CC was only good for normal results, which involves the majority of cases and positively influences the overall agreement rate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dc.20699DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

kappa coefficient
12
agreement conventional
8
liquid-based cytology
8
cervical cancer
8
cancer early
8
early detection
8
agreement
8
percent agreement
8
normal versus
8
evaluation agreement
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!