Purpose: The introduction of new surgical approaches to radical prostatectomy requires methodologies that permit valid comparison that are more expedient than long-term outcomes of biochemical local and distant failure and survival. We used a computer modeling program to assess the percent of extracapsular tissue coverage of prostate glands removed by the open retropubic and laparoscopic approaches.
Materials And Methods: Specimens were available for 15 and 17 patients who underwent open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, respectively. Serial whole mount sections were taken at 5 mm intervals. A genitourinary pathologist drew the contours of the prostate capsule on each tissue section. The whole mount was scanned to produce digital images. A software program was used to create a file with capsule information and a file with extraprostatic fibroadipose tissue information. Two separate point cloud files were generated to represent the capsule and extraprostatic models, and software algorithms were used to generate differences in the point clouds to quantify the extent of extracapsular tissue coverage.
Results: When separated into sides dissected by a nerve or nonnerve sparing technique, the overall percent of gland surface coverage by extracapsular fibroadipose tissue was statistically greater with laparoscopic dissection than with the open approach. When a segmental analysis of gland coverage was evaluated, a statistically greater percent of fibroadipose coverage was associated with laparoscopic dissection in the apical and inferolateral segments with nonnerve sparing, and in the apical segment with nerve sparing.
Conclusions: This small radical prostatectomy series, analyzed by computer reconstruction as described, provides information suggesting that overall extracapsular tissue coverage is at least equal if not superior using the laparoscopic vs the open approach. This was specifically the case in areas of inferolateral and apical dissection with nonnerve sparing procedures and in areas of the apical dissection with nerve sparing procedures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.164 | DOI Listing |
Aesthetic Plast Surg
January 2025
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Miami, FL, USA.
Introduction: Silicone Lymphadenopathy (SL) is a complication of breast implants that involves migration of silicone to nearby soft tissue/lymph nodes. Data on its clinical features and management is scarce. We aimed to identify the clinical presentation and management of SL.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
November 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, USA.
Background The United States continues to rank as one of the most expensive healthcare systems in the world, and cataract surgery, the most commonly performed surgery, is one of the primary drivers of healthcare expenditure. Increasing efforts have been made to try to minimize U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRadiol Case Rep
February 2025
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Srm Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Srm Nagar, Potheri, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu 603203, India.
In the setting of trauma, occurrence of intracapsular lipo-hemarthrosis is not uncommon, highly useful and well known imaging finding. Occurrence of extracapsular lipohaemarthrosis is uncommon and have been noticed around the large joints like knee, hip, and shoulder joints. Extracapsular lipohaemarthrosis is rare especially around small joints like wrist joint.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGynecol Oncol Rep
December 2024
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, Ontario L8V 5C2, Canada.
Cureus
November 2024
Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Patna, IND.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!