The psychology of meta-ethics: exploring objectivism.

Cognition

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

Published: March 2008

How do lay individuals think about the objectivity of their ethical beliefs? Do they regard them as factual and objective, or as more subjective and opinion-based, and what might predict such differences? In three experiments, we set out a methodology for assessing the perceived objectivity of ethical beliefs, and use it to document several novel findings. Experiment 1 showed that individuals tend to regard ethical statements as clearly more objective than social conventions and tastes, and almost as objective as scientific facts. Yet, there was considerable variation in objectivism, both across different ethical statements, and across individuals. The extent to which individuals treat ethical beliefs as objective was predicted by the way they grounded their ethical systems. Groundings which emphasize the religious, pragmatic, and self-identity underpinnings of ethical belief each independently predicted greater ethical objectivity. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings with a refined measure of ethical objectivism. Experiment 3 demonstrated the robustness of the religious grounding of ethics, and differentiates it from mere religious belief and from political orientation. The results shed light on the nature of ethical belief, and have implications for the resolution of ethical disputes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ethical
11
objectivity ethical
8
ethical beliefs
8
ethical statements
8
ethical belief
8
psychology meta-ethics
4
meta-ethics exploring
4
exploring objectivism
4
objectivism lay
4
individuals
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!