Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The study was carried out as an open-label, laboratory-blind, single-dose, randomized, two-period crossover, isotope efficacy study. Twenty-two patients with iron-deficiency anemia were enrolled in the study. The study consisted of two treatment phases of 15 days each, including blood sample measurements for Fe-59 activity. The 2 treatments were given orally. Treatment A was Fe-59 labeled iron(III)-hydroxide polymaltose complex (IPC, Maltofer), equivalent to 100 mg elemental iron given orally, and Treatment B consisted of Treatment A combined with 600 mg aluminium hydroxide (CAS 21645-51-2) (10 ml). No differences between the two treatment groups with regard to the erythrocyte uptake were found, and thus IPC can be used with aluminium hydroxide, if necessary.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1296688 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!