Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We studied interaction of a radiofrequency scalpel and a semiconductor laser with the tissue phantom. The heated part of the phantom can be easily removed and measured for size of the coagulated area. We investigated to what extent the width of the coagulation necrosis along the incision is influenced by the power and speed of each instrument used for incision. As for the laser, the width of the coagulation zone increased with rise of power and slowing of cutting velocity. For the scalpel, this relationship between incision velocity and coagulation effect was much weaker but had the same trend. We compared hemostasis efficiency during uvulopalatoplasty with both instruments. Much more potent hemostatic effect was registered in laser uvulopalatoplasty.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!