Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To observe and compare the curative effect of pingyangmycin and sodium morrhuae respectively in the treatment of oral and maxillofacial venous malformation.
Methods: Forty cases of oral and maxillofacial venous malformation were induced in this study, 20 of which were given local injection of low dose of pingyangmycin, and 20 given local injection of 5% sodium morrheate. The therapeutic effects were observed.
Results: The effective cases of pingyangmycin was 19, and the effective cases of sodium morrhuate was 12. The side effect was found in 10 cases of, and in 15 cases sodium morrhuate group, the former was mainly pingymangmycin group systemic, the later was mainly local. The difference was significant between the two groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Pingyangmycin is more effective in effective rate and side effect treatment of venous hemangioma than sodium morrhuate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!