Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), circadian variability of RR and QT intervals may be altered because of neurohumoral activation and functional and structural remodeling of the heart.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of circadian variability of the RR and QT intervals and QT dynamicity (QT/RR slope) in CHF patients.
Methods: We prospectively enrolled 121 patients with stable CHF in sinus rhythm (age 67 +/- 14 years, mean +/- SD; range 34 to 87 years). The RR, QT, and rate-corrected QT (QTc) intervals and the QT/RR slope measured from 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram were fitted by cosine curves.
Results: During the follow-up period of 34 +/- 17 months, 40 (33%) patients died of cardiac causes, 10 of which were sudden. All patients showed significant circadian rhythms in the RR, QT, and QTc intervals and the QT/RR slope by cosine-curve fitting. In addition to the expected higher heart rate, longer QT interval, and steeper QT/RR slope, we found that patient who died of cardiac causes had reduced circadian variability of QT interval (10 +/- 10 ms vs 21 +/- 13 ms) and a later maximum RR interval (4.1 +/- 0.9 AM vs 2.3 +/- 2.1 AM) compared with survivors, among many other statistically significant circadian parameter differences. These 2 parameters were independent predictors of cardiac death in multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
Conclusion: Circadian variability analyses of Holter-derived RR and QT intervals may provide prognostic information beyond that provided by 24-hour averages of these parameters.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.04.019 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!