Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical technique, morbidity, and motility of a novel microporous, high-density, polyethylene implant with magnetic coupling of the prosthesis and implant. Four adult patients requiring enucleation underwent implantation of a microporous, high-density, polyethylene implant with an integrated stainless steel, titanium-coated post. The motility of a magnetically embedded prosthesis was assessed by measuring lateral prosthetic excursion using digital photography. Clinical grading documented increased motility with a magnetically integrated prosthesis versus a nonmagnetically integrated prosthesis. The magnetically integrated microporous high-density implant appears to be an effective approach.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/15428877-20070701-14 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!