This study examines the influence of a successful PCI upon preoperative patient profile, peroperative management and postoperative, including one-year follow-up, results. From January 1999 through December 2001, 1141 patients (91%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the primary intervention for myocardial revascularization (group A) and 113 patients (9%) underwent primary CABG after an initially successful PCI (group B). Patients undergoing CABG after a failed PCI were not included. Patients in group B were statistically significant younger (P=0.010), with more peripheral arterial vascular (P=0.015) and renal disease (P=0.036). Left main coronary artery stenosis was significantly lower in group B (P=0.004). The number of diseased vessels did not differ between the two groups. However, less distal anastomoses were performed in group B (P=0.001). Postoperatively there was no statistically significant differences, in the percentages of myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, reinterventions, neurological, renal and pulmonary complications, and hospital mortality. One-year follow-up did not show any statistically significant differences in cardiac related mortality (P=0.25) or recurrent ischemic events (P=0.27). Multivariate analysis did not identify a successful PCI as a risk factor for early and late adverse outcomes. Previous PCI does not seem to result in a higher postoperative mortality or morbidity after CABG.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2004.093104 | DOI Listing |
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther
December 2024
Department of Cardiovascular, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Saudi Heart Assoc
December 2024
School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Objectives: This study aimed to identify the barriers to and enablers of secondary prevention care and cardiac rehabilitation (CR) utilization by patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from the perspective of policymakers.
Methods: A qualitative study involving an interpretive descriptive design was conducted through recorded semistructured interviews with key decision-makers in cardiology care in Saudi Arabia. The analysis was guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which informed the resulting themes.
J Am Coll Cardiol
January 2025
Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/DLBHATTMD.
Background: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease, most but not all randomized trials have reported that complete revascularization (CR) offers advantages over culprit vessel-only revascularization. In addition, the optimal timing and assessment methods for CR remain undetermined.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, using a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Acta Cardiol Sin
January 2025
School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University.
Acta Cardiol Sin
January 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Aims: This study aims to verify the feasibility and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after a distal transradial approach (dTRA) with radial artery occlusion (RAO) recanalization.
Methods: Between July 2018 and January 2022, 30 patients underwent PCI following attempted RAO recanalization via dTRA. Among these cases, the target radial arteries could not be recanalized in five patients, necessitating alternative vascular access.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!