MIKE 3 versus HARTMANN apparatus: comparison of measured minimum ignition energy (MIE).

J Hazard Mater

INERIS, Parc ALATA BP 2, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.

Published: March 2008

In this study, MIE values measured with two different explosion tubes, HARTMANN and MIKE 3, are compared. Generally, MIKE 3 apparatus provides MIE results, which are equal or lower to those measured with the HARTMANN apparatus; this is particularly true for the energy ranges between 1 and 10mJ and higher than 100mJ. Differences observed can modify samples classification according to their sensitivity to electrostatic ignition sources. Nevertheless, ignition of a dust cloud by an electrostatic discharge is complex, and implies a different mechanism from that occurring during MIE tests. Thus, it seems difficult to synchronise dust dispersion and spark triggering to obtain optimal concentration in the spark area. Moreover, spark characteristics such as duration or energy feeding rate of spark cannot reproduce exactly industrial-world ones. On this point, it is not possible to conclude if characteristics of MIKE 3 electric circuit, e.g., resistance and inductance, are more relevant than HARTMANN circuit ones.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.066DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hartmann apparatus
8
mike
4
mike versus
4
hartmann
4
versus hartmann
4
apparatus comparison
4
comparison measured
4
measured minimum
4
minimum ignition
4
ignition energy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!