A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Safety, tolerance and acceptability of the Invisible Condom and its vaginal applicator in healthy women and their male sexual partners. | LitMetric

Objectives: The study was conducted to evaluate the safety and acceptability of the Invisible Condom when applied once or twice daily for 14 days in healthy women and their male sexual partners.

Study Design: Forty-one women and 23 men divided into three cohorts were enrolled. Cohort 1:14 sexually abstinent women applying gel twice daily for 14 days; Cohort 2:14 sexually active women with tubal ligation applying gel once daily for 14 days and their 14 sexual partners who did not use gel; Cohort 3:13 women on oral contraceptive applying gel once daily for 14 days and 9 of their sexual partners.

Results: No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. Colposcopy showed no genital ulceration nor epithelial lesions. No major changes in vaginal flora or vaginal pH were detected. None of the women had to stop product application because of AEs. The majority of AEs were mild. Common AEs were itching, dryness, burning sensation, erythema and discharge. Satisfaction questionnaire showed that the gel and applicator were acceptable.

Conclusion: The Invisible Condom and applicator were safe, well tolerated and acceptable when applied intravaginally for 14 days. Thus, expanded safety and effectiveness evaluation is warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2007.04.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

daily days
16
invisible condom
12
applying gel
12
gel daily
12
acceptability invisible
8
healthy women
8
women male
8
male sexual
8
sexual partners
8
days sexual
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!