Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the salivary gland is a rare entity. A distinction of 2 variants has been proposed: the low-grade tumor with a favourable prognosis and the high-grade tumor with a poor prognosis. Indeed, MEC is a cancer with a relative favourable outcome and more than 90% of patients survive for more than 5 years after diagnosis, reduced to about 70% after 10 years. This excellent prognosis might contribute to the unacceptable retention of the term "mucoepidermoid tumor" in the medical terminology, even in current medical textbooks. However, the distinction of MEC by grading is a guideline only and it is not appropriate to use this histological term as a prediction for individual cases. We describe the rapid fatal outcome of a patient with MEC in order to emphasize the malignant characteristics of this tumor and the possible application of tumor markers for the diagnosis of metastasizing MEC.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!