Monitoring CSA levels at two h after dosing (C2) has been shown effective in providing adequate CSA-based immunosuppression in clinical trials in adult transplant recipients, but there is limited data regarding C2 monitoring in pediatric transplant recipients. Given the differences in CSA pharmacokinetics between children and adults, a cohort of stable pediatric transplant recipients was converted from monitoring CSA trough (C0) to C2 levels, to establish the clinical utility and safety of C2 monitoring. After an abbreviated AUC(0-5) to establish baseline exposure, subsequent CSA dosing was adjusted based on C2 levels. Additional evaluation included monitoring for rejection, changes in CSA dose, toxicity, serum chemistries, and infection. Twelve heart transplant recipients were enrolled, with mean age 4.8 yr (range: 0.6-14.0). All patients received microemulsified CSA (Neoral((R)); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA) twice daily. Baseline CSA dose was 5.39 +/- 2.05 mg/kg/day (mean +/- s.d.), with mean C0 = 267 +/- 112, C2 = 1065 +/- 565, and AUC(0-5) = 3817 +/- 1435. Only seven participants showed clear CSA peak levels at two h, with five exhibiting delayed peaks at three to five h post-dose. These seven participants completed 48 wk of study, with mean CSA dose decreasing to 4.55 +/- 3.61 mg/kg/day, maintaining mean C2 599 +/- 211 (vs. target C2 = 800). No significant change in serum creatinine was observed, although GFR increased from 76.9 to 107.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.11). Five patients failed to achieve target C2 levels (>800) during the first four wk, despite comparable AUC values, and were maintained on trough monitoring (C0). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures fell slightly, three minor infections were noted during the study period, and one episode of acute rejection occurred, despite stable CSA dosing. Nearly 50% of stable pediatric transplant recipients failed to achieve adequate peak C2 CSA levels during conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring. Age-dependent differences in CSA absorption and/or clearance pharmacokinetics may explain these findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3046.2007.00712.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transplant recipients
24
csa
12
pediatric transplant
12
csa dose
12
monitoring
8
monitoring pediatric
8
heart transplant
8
monitoring csa
8
csa levels
8
differences csa
8

Similar Publications

We created and validated the Neuro-Score, a specific scale to detect and monitor cognitive impairment, including mild stages, in kidney or liver transplant recipients. A qualitative study was conducted to define a preliminary set of 62 items. Item reduction was performed using exploratory factor analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Delirium is a common issue following liver transplantation (LT), but research has mainly focused on single-center cohorts.

Methods: We studied delirium in a national cohort of adult LT recipients transplanted October, 2015-December, 2020 using the MarketScan database. Claims data were used to identify LT recipients with delirium.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Donor-derived Cryptococcus gattii complex infection after liver transplantation.

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop

January 2025

Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Programa de pós-graduação em Medicina Interna e Ciências da Saúde, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

Cryptococcal disease is the third most common invasive fungal infection in solid organ transplant recipients and is associated with high-morbidity and -mortality rates. Donor-derived Cryptococcus spp. infection typically manifests within the first month post-procedure and has historically been caused by C.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses a significant risk to kidney transplant recipients. This study investigated CMV disease incidence, outcomes, and management challenges in racial and ethnic minority populations following kidney transplantation.

Methods: This single-center, mixed-methods study included a retrospective cohort analysis of kidney transplant recipients (n = 58) and qualitative surveys of healthcare providers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!