Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We tested the hypothesis that the results of operative resection of a proximal radioulnar synostosis are better when the synostosis is due to a distal biceps reattachment (11 patients) than when it occurs after trauma (13 patients). Two patients in the trauma cohort had recurrence of the synostosis, and 1 had repeat resection. Two patients in the trauma cohort and 1 in the biceps cohort had substantial loss of forearm rotation due to regrowth of heterotopic ossification without synostosis, and 2 patients were addressed with subsequent surgeries. The arc of forearm rotation after the index surgery averaged 94 degrees in the trauma cohort and 131 degrees in the biceps cohort. This study confirms that operative resection of a proximal radioulnar synostosis can restore substantial motion in most patients. The results for excision of a synostosis after a distal biceps reattachment were better than those of excision of a synostosis after trauma.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.01.003 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!