Recent advances in our understanding of cardiovascular disease have revealed that atherothrombotic events, such as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, are the end result of a complex inflammatory response to multifaceted vascular pathology. As well as initiating thrombus formation at the site of a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque, platelets play a key role in vascular inflammation, through release of their own pro-inflammatory mediators and interactions with other relevant cell types (endothelial cells, leukocytes, and smooth muscle cells). An increasing body of literature shows that inflammatory biomarkers can be used to predict atherothrombotic risk and that antiplatelet therapy may reduce the levels of these markers. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) has been attributed with reducing levels of the transcription factor nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB), C-reactive protein, and soluble CD40 ligand, although the evidence relating to the latter two markers is conflicting. There is also substantial evidence that therapy with clopidogrel, a specific antagonist of the platelet P2Y12 ADP-receptor, also leads to reductions in serum levels of CD40 ligand, C-reactive protein, P-selectin, and platelet-leukocyte aggregate formation. Beneficial effects of clopidogrel on inflammatory markers have been demonstrated across the spectrum of atherothrombotic disease (acute coronary syndrome patients, patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), acute ischemic stroke patients, and those with peripheral arterial disease). Oral glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, at doses that achieve moderate levels of receptor blockade, may paradoxically be associated with platelet-mediated pro-inflammatory effects. A similar phenomenon has been observed with intravenous GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in vitro, but most often at low doses, and data from clinical studies suggest that these agents may actually attenuate release of inflammatory mediators when administered at doses producing more complete receptor blockade.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X07077462 | DOI Listing |
Egypt Heart J
January 2025
Tehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, North Kargar Ave, Tehran, Iran.
Background: Many studies have validated the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in coronary artery ectasia (CAE) to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); however, it is not completely known which group of these antithrombotic medications is more effective. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of different anti-thrombotic treatments in adult patients with CAE.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as well as PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses and adhered to a registered predetermined methodology noted in the prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) protocol.
Coron Artery Dis
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Assiut University Heart Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.
Background: No-reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is challenging to treat.
Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upstream high-bolus-dose tirofiban administration in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases undergoing PPCI on top of dual antiplatelet therapy, including ticagrelor, in comparison to selective bailout administration.
Methods: This hospital-based, randomized, single-blinded prospective interventional study was conducted on 150 patients at Assiut University Heart Hospital.
J Endovasc Ther
January 2025
Department of Vascular Surgery, Northwest Hospital Group, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Objective: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy (ATT) after popliteal and infrapopliteal (PIP) endovascular therapy (EVT). Currently, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 3 months and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) are the most prescribed regimens in the Netherlands. Thus far, no randomized comparison has been performed on the optimal ATT approach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAngiology
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
This meta-analysis evaluates outcomes in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (bAVR), comparing different antithrombotic strategies. We conducted a systematic search through May 2024. A standard meta-analysis compared outcomes between patients who received anticoagulation therapy (AC) and those who did not.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Pharmacol
January 2025
Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Background: Patients with comorbid coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease usually undergo coronary artery bypass grafting alongside valve replacement or ring repair surgeries. Following these procedures, they typically receive a combination of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, which notably heightens their bleeding risk. However, Current scoring systems provide limited predictive capability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!