Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The problems of disintubation and obstruction of nutritional catheters are common during treatment with enteral nutrition. This prospective study has been designed to evaluate the differences in the frequency of obstruction between two different types of enteral nutrition catheter. Catheter A (Silk, Ibys) with one single lateral outlet, wide, long and with a curved edge, and Catheter B (Nutrisoft M, Kabi-Pfrimmer), with several smaller lateral holes, 46 nutritional periods were studied, divided into two groups: first group, n = 32 (catheter A) and second group n = 14 (catheter B, Nutrisoft M, Kabi-Pfrimmer). There were no significant differences between both groups for the type of diet administered, osmolarity, speed, volume administered, number and duration of interruptions, external fixation, washing of the catheter and duration of the nutritional period. The catheter slipped out in 21 periods (46%). Obstruction of the catheter was the cause of disintubation of the catheter in eight cases, five of the cases with catheter A (15%) and three cases with catheter B (21%); there were no significant differences between the values for both. These results indicate that the frequency of obstruction is similar with both catheters; however, the Silk catheter may have a better tolerance and be easier to intubate, due to its smaller external diameter.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!