Objective: To evaluate the results of treatment with an insulin glargine-based regimen as compared with those of an NPH insulin-based regimen.
Methods: We reviewed the charts of 83 Japanese patients with Type 1 diabetes treated with insulin glargine for 12 months.
Patients: Median age, 56.9 years (range, 24.6-74.8 years), mean (+/-S.D.) body mass index, 21.2 (+/-2.2) kg/m2.
Results: The average HbA1c level of the cohort was 7.8 +/- 1.2% at baseline and 7.7 +/- 1.0% at the end of the 12-month treatment (P=0.34). The average insulin requirement per day in the cohort remained unchanged after the 12-month treatment (35.0 +/- 11.6 units/day versus 35.2 +/- 11.2 units/day (P=0.58). Of the 36 patients who were receiving twice or three times daily injections of NPH insulin, 30 could be switched to a single-daily injection of insulin glargine. The frequency of severe hypoglycemia with unconsciousness became lower after switching to the insulin glargine-based regimen than during treatment with the NPH-based regimen. The average ratio of the daily usage of insulin glargine to that of total insulin after 12 months was smaller than that reported from other countries (0.34 +/- 0.09).
Conclusion: These results obtained from a larger number of patients as compared to previous Japanese studies confirm earlier reports that insulin glargine provides equivalent glycemic control to human NPH insulin, with a lower incidence of severe hypoglycemia. Thus, treatment with insulin glargine provides some benefits to Japanese patients with Type 1 diabetes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.46.6467 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
December 2024
Emergency Department, Bahria International Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK.
This case report presents a rare instance of a 28-year-old female patient with insulin-induced abdominal lipodystrophy, who presented to the emergency department with symptoms of an anxiety attack triggered by body image distress. She was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of eight years. For the past 10 years, she has been using insulin glargine and insulin lispro, injecting roughly five times per day.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiabetes Obes Metab
January 2025
Medical Care Center Endocrinology and Diabetology, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Aims: This study assessed efficacy and safety of the fixed ratio combination iGlarLixi 100/33 (insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide 33 μg/mL) in people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D) in daily clinical practice.
Materials And Methods: This non-interventional, multicentre, prospective, single-arm 24-week study documented PwT2D with an HbA1c of 7.5%-10.
Cureus
November 2024
Department of Pharmacology, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND.
Diabetes mellitus represents a significant and growing global health challenge, with its prevalence steadily increasing. Insulin therapy remains a cornerstone of diabetes management. Since its discovery in 1921, insulin has undergone substantial advancements, evolving from crude animal extracts to highly refined recombinant formulations and biosimilars.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAAPS J
December 2024
Laboratory of Immunology, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Research Division-IV, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Characterizing and mitigating factors that impact product immunogenicity can aid in risk assessment and/or managing risk following manufacturing changes. For follow-on products that have the same indication, patient population, and active product ingredient, the residual immunogenicity risk resides predominantly on differences in product and process related impurities. Characterizing differences in innate immune modulating impurities (IIRMI), which could act as adjuvants by activating local antigen presenting cells (APCs), can inform the immunogenicity risk assessment potentially reducing the need for clinical trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiabetes Ther
December 2024
Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Introduction: ONWARDS 5 evaluated the effectiveness and safety of insulin icodec (icodec) titrated with a dosing guide app (icodec with app) versus once-daily insulin analogs in insulin-naive adults with type 2 diabetes. The insulin glargine U300 (glargine U300) stratum was too small to enable a robust post hoc efficacy comparison. Augmentation methodology was applied to increase the glargine U300 group size using real-world data (RWD), to facilitate efficacy comparisons of icodec with app versus glargine U300, and to demonstrate the potential of the augmentation methodology to strengthen underpowered treatment comparisons (AUGMENT study).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!