Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Shape recognition of natural objects was studied under conditions of tachistoscopic (12 ms) presentation and different degree of noise-like ("rain drops") masking in 15 healthy subjects. Three set of figures were used: halftone, contour and silhouette. For all sets of figures, mean group data reveal a drop of the correct response probability with increase in masking. Recognition of contours was shown to be significantly better than that of halftone and silhouette figures, whereas halftone figures were recognized better than silhouettes. Possible neurophysiological mechanisms of the revealed phenomena and their functional implication are discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!