Comparison of stent graft, sirolimus stent, and bare metal stent implanted in patients with acute coronary syndrome: clinical and angiographic follow-up.

Aim: To compare polytetrafluoroethylene stent graft (PTFE) with sirolimus and bare metal stents in reducing in-stent restenosis in native coronary vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Methods: The study included patients who underwent stent implantation in acute coronary syndrome from January 2003 to May 2004. The patients (n=119) were randomized either to stent graft group (n=40), sirolimus eluting stent group (n=39), or bare metal stent group (n=40). The main outcome measure of the study was the incidence restenosis at 6-month. The secondary outcome was 6-month major adverse coronary event rate.

Results: The incidence of 6-month major adverse coronary events was similar in all three groups (8 events in stent graft, 9 in sirolimus eluting stent, and 16 in bare metal stent group events). The target lesion revascularization was higher in the bare metal stent group (P=0.044). Restenosis rate, at six-month follow-up was higher in the bare metal stent group compared with the stent graft and sirolimus eluting stent groups. The percent diameter stenosis in the follow-up was significantly higher in the bare metal stent group (P=0.005). The late loss was significantly lower in the sirolimus eluting stent group (mean+/-standard deviation, 0.2+/-0.5 mm), compared with the bare metal stent group (0.7+/-0.7 mm, P=0.034). There was a trend of lower late loss in the stent graft group than in the bare metal stent group.

Conclusion: Three groups of stents implanted in patients with acute coronary syndrome did not differ in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. Sirolimus-eluting stents had a lower incidence of in-stent restenosis than bare metal stent group. Stent graft implanted in native coronary arteries appears to be safe and efficient in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but a significant reduction in in-stent restenosis was not achieved.