Background: Patients' preferences for medications may be important in determining their compliance with therapy, particularly in the case of an asymptomatic chronic disease such as osteoporosis. Although preferences for certain attributes of osteoporosis medications, including dosing frequency and tolerability, can be evaluated in short-term clinical trials, years of use may be necessary for differences in effectiveness in reducing fracture risk to emerge.

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relative importance of various attributes in determining patients' preferences for osteoporosis medications. Its secondary aim was to investigate patients' preferences for either of 2 hypothetical osteoporosis medications with different profiles.

Methods: The Preference for Effective Regimens (PREFER)-International study was a cross-sectional survey of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in France, Germany, Mexico, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Participants were recruited by their physicians in the 4 European countries and were identified by trained interviewers going door to door in Mexico. Participants were administered a questionnaire in which they were asked to rate and rank the importance of 7 medication attributes in determining their preferences for prescription osteoporosis medications. The attributes were side effects, out-of-pocket costs, effectiveness in improving bone health and preventing fractures, dosing frequency, formulation, administration procedure, and length of time on the market. They were also asked to indicate their preference for 2 hypothetical osteoporosis medications whose profiles differed in terms of efficacy (medication A reduced the risk of spine and hip fracture; medication B reduced spine fracture only), time on the market (10 years vs recently introduced), dosing frequency (weekly vs monthly), and dosing procedure (30- vs 60-minute wait after dosing).

Results: Of 3000 patients interviewed, 1500 were receiving prescription treatment for osteoporosis. Across the rankings and ratings, effectiveness in reducing the risk of fracture emerged as the most important factor in determining patients' preferences for prescription osteoporosis medications, followed by side effects. Out-of-pocket costs, dosing frequency, formulation, time on the market, and dosing procedure were less important considerations among respondents from most countries. The majority (78%) of patients indicated a preference for medication A over medication B.

Conclusion: Effectiveness in reducing fracture risk was cited as the primary reason for patients' preference for prescription osteoporosis medications among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from 4 European countries and Mexico.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2918(07)80087-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

osteoporosis medications
32
patients' preferences
20
dosing frequency
16
osteoporosis
12
effectiveness reducing
12
prescription osteoporosis
12
time market
12
medications
9
preferences osteoporosis
8
medications attributes
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), enhancing survival and quality of life. However, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk for bone disorders, particularly low bone turnover disease, which increases fracture risk. Teriparatide, an anabolic agent, may provide a beneficial treatment option for these patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The immune-responsive gene 1 (IRG1) protein plays a role in various pathological processes by connecting cellular metabolism to a range of cellular activities through the production of itaconate. Recent studies have highlighted the significance of IRG1 and itaconate in bone metabolism and homeostasis. However, the precise role of IRG1 in osteoporosis remains inadequately documented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prediction of hip fracture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography in older Swedish women.

J Bone Miner Res

January 2025

Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

The socioeconomic burden of hip fractures, the most severe osteoporotic fracture outcome, is increasing and the current clinical risk assessment lacks sensitivity. This study aimed to develop a method for improved prediction of hip fracture by incorporating measurements of bone microstructure and composition derived from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). In a prospective cohort study of 3028 community-dwelling women aged 75 to 80, all participants answered questionnaires and underwent baseline examinations of anthropometrics and bone by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and HR-pQCT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The impact of fatty liver disease on lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) represents an intriguing area of study, particularly in light of established research linking obesity to bone metabolism. However, there remains limited investigation into the correlation between quantifying liver fat content (LFC) and lumbar BMD among overweight and obese populations, particularly within the Chinese demographic. This study aims to accurately quantify LFC and investigate its association with lumbar BMD in overweight or obese individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The underlying mechanisms of the association of bone health with depression - an experimental study.

Mol Biol Rep

January 2025

Medical Sociology and Psychobiology, Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Potsdam, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.

Background: Depression constitutes a risk factor for osteoporosis, but underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms are not fully understood. MiRNAs influence gene expression and are carried by extracellular vesicles (EV), affecting cell-cell communication.

Aims: (1) Identify the difference in miRNA expression between depressed patients and healthy controls; (2) Analyze associations of these miRNAs with bone turnover markers; (3) Analyze target genes of differentially regulated miRNAs and predict associated pathways regarding depression and bone metabolism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!