A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Predictors of remission of hyperprolactinaemia after long-term withdrawal of cabergoline therapy. | LitMetric

Background: Remission rates of 76, 69.5 and 64.3% have been reported in patients with nontumoural hyperprolactinaemia (NTH), microprolactinoma and macroprolactinoma, respectively, 2-5 years after cabergoline (CAB) withdrawal.

Objective: To report the estimated recurrence rate at 24-96 months after CAB withdrawal and indicate predictors of disease remission.

Design: Observational, analytical, prospective.

Patients: Of 381 previously untreated de novo patients with hyperprolactinaemia, 221 (58%) (173 women, 48 men; 27 with NTH, 115 with micro-, and 79 with macroprolactinoma) were studied.

Measurements: Using multiple regression analysis the diagnostic accuracy of nadir PRL levels (t = 7.6, P < 0.0001) and nadir maximal tumour diameter at CAB withdrawal (t = 3.9, P < 0.001) was analysed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: The recurrence of hyperprolactinaemia was 25.9, 33.9 and 53.1% in patients with NTH, micro- or macroprolactinoma, respectively. To predict the last PRL level after withdrawal, the optimum cut-off of nadir PRL levels at withdrawal was 162 mU/l (5.4 microg/l) [sensitivity (95% CI) 76% (67-84%), specificity 65% (51-77%)] and that of nadir maximal tumour diameter was 3.1 mm [sensitivity 52% (41-63%), specificity 86% (79-91%)]. The patients achieving both nadir PRL levels
Conclusion: Persistent remission of hyperprolactinaemia without any evidence of tumour re-growth after 24-96 months of CAB withdrawal occurred in the majority of patients with NTH and microprolactinoma and in about half of those with macroprolactinoma. Nadir PRL levels and maximal tumour diameter at CAB withdrawal of

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02905.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nadir prl
12
prl levels
12
cab withdrawal
8
micro- macroprolactinoma
8
nadir maximal
8
maximal tumour
8
tumour diameter
8
withdrawal
5
nadir
5
predictors remission
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!