Wildlife ecological screening levels for inhalation of volatile organic chemicals.

Environ Toxicol Chem

Neptune and Company, 1505 15th Street, Suite B, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA.

Published: June 2007

AI Article Synopsis

  • Traditional ecological risk assessments often overlook inhalation exposure, mainly focusing on ingestion; however, burrowing animals may be at higher risk due to inhaling volatile chemicals underground.
  • To fill the gap in risk evaluation for volatile organic chemicals (VOCs), inhalation ecological screening levels (ESLs) were created for 16 specific compounds, including benzene and toluene, using Botta's pocket gopher as a study model.
  • The article outlines how these ESLs were developed, emphasizing the importance of proper toxicity data selection for assessing the ecological risks associated with inhalation exposure to VOCs.

Article Abstract

For most chemicals, evaluation of ecological risk typically does not address inhalation because ingestion dominates exposure. However, burrowing ecological receptors have an increased exposure potential from inhalation at sites contaminated with volatile chemicals in the subsurface. Evaluation of ecological risk from contaminants like volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) is constrained by a lack of relevant ecological screening levels (ESLs). To address this need, inhalation ESLs were developed for 16 VOCs: Acetone, benzene, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, chloromethane, dichlorodifluoromethane, 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethene, methylene chloride, tetrachloroethene, toluene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethene, trichlorofluoromethane, and total xylene. These ESLs are based on Botta's pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) as a representative fossorial receptor. The ESLs are presented with an emphasis on the process for developing inhalation toxicity reference values to illustrate the selection of suitable toxicity data and effect levels from the literature. The resulting ESLs provide a quantitative method for evaluating ecological risk of VOCs through comparison to relevant exposure data such as direct burrow-air measurements. The toxicity reference value development and ESL calculation processes and assumptions detailed here are provided as bases from which risk assessors can use or refine to suit site-specific needs with respect to toxicity and exposure inputs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1897/06-233r.1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ecological risk
12
ecological screening
8
screening levels
8
volatile organic
8
organic chemicals
8
evaluation ecological
8
address inhalation
8
toxicity reference
8
inhalation
5
ecological
5

Similar Publications

Traditional ecological and human health risk assessment often relies on deterministic frameworks that preclude the presence of variability or uncertainty among input parameters characterizing exposure, effects, and risk. To promote increased realism and generate more robust risk management decisions, probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) has been introduced as a foundational grouping of techniques that seeks to broadly characterize variability among its components. While multiple methods exist (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

East Coast Fever (ECF) is one of the leading causes of livestock mortality and reduced productivity across Eastern Africa, and while a live vaccine against it known as the Infection and Treatment Method has existed for three decades now, its adoption by affected communities remains low. This study sought to provide a detailed examination of the dynamics that shape Infection Treatment Method (ITM) vaccine adoption behaviours. The study examined individual, socio-cultural and ecological- level factors influencing ITM adoption using the socio-ecological model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ecological ditches serve as one of the important measures for the concentrated infiltration of stormwater in the construction process of sponge cities. Prolonged concentrated infiltration of stormwater can lead to the accumulation of pollutants and pollution risks in the substrate of ecological ditches. In this study, two different substrate ecological ditches were constructed, namely, a combined substrate ecological ditch with zeolite + ceramsite (EA), and a biological substrate ecological ditch (EB).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Developing Adverse Outcome Pathways to support radioecological risk assessment: Challenges and insights.

Environ Toxicol Chem

January 2025

Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Laboratoire d'Ecologie et d'Ecotoxicologie des Radionucléides, Cadarache, 13115 France Saint Paul-Lez-Durance.

Environmental pollution associated with long term effects, especially in the case of ionizing radiation, poses significant risks to wildlife, necessitating a more nuanced approach to Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA). In radioecology, current methods, as outlined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), focus primarily on exposure and individual/population-level effects, often both suffering a lack of ecological realism due to the nature of data used, and, sidelining a big amount of critical non-individual effects such as sub-individual one like genotoxicity. This review aims to address these gaps by suggesting the integration of New Approach Methods (NAMs) and the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework in the field of radioecology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A key component of ecological risk assessments is to develop evidence-based benchmarks to assess potential hazards to various receptors. To ensure that toxicity value development is performed using the best available science, the reliability (or inherent scientific quality) of these studies must be considered. The degree of reliability can be evaluated via critical appraisal tools (CATs), though application of such methods assessing ecotoxicological literature for toxicity value development is not well established compared to human health assessments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!